Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 1001220080100010021
Journal of the Korean Society of Digital Medical Imaging Technology
2008 Volume.10 No. 1 p.21 ~ p.28
A Study on Production and Its Usefulness of AAPM TG18 Guiding Instrument for Diagnostic Monitor QC
Son Gi-Gyeong

Sung Dong-Wook
Jeong Jae-Ho
Kang Hee-Doo
Ryu Kyung-Nam
Abstract
Diagnostic display monitor QA according to AAPM TG18 is usually performed by PACS administrator, product manager and reading doctor, and for acceptance testing and periodic quality control evaluation, a combination of visual and quantitative tests can be used, as outlined in sections 5 and 6 of ¡¯assessment of display performance for medical imaging systems¡¯. Although many display tests can be performed visually, a more objective and quantitative evaluation of display performance requires special test tools. The required instruments vary in their complexity and cost, depending on the context of the evaluation(research, acceptance testing, or quality control) and how thorough the evaluation needs to be. Objective and reliable assessment of many display characteristics can be performed with relatively inexpensive equipment, So, we made ¡¯AAPM TG18 guiding instrument¡¯ to ues variable purpose of the evaluation of ¡¯geometrical distortions(quantitative"¡¯, ¡¯veiling glare(visual)¡¯ and ¡¯sensor calibration¡¯. The spatial measurements for the quantitative evaluation of geometric distortions, and the measurement of the veling-glare ring response function which provides information regarding the spatial extent of the luminance spread, can be performed using the TG18 guiding instrument can be used to sensor calibration to standardize the basic rate of 0% luminance when periodic calibration.
KEYWORD
PACS, Diagnostic Monitor, AAPM TG18, Quality Control
FullTexts / Linksout information
 
Listed journal information